skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Kudekar, Shrinivas"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available April 6, 2026
  2. Consider a binary linear code of length N, minimum distance dmin, transmission over the binary erasure channel with parameter 0 <  < 1 or the binary symmetric channel with parameter 0 <  < 1 2 , and block-MAP decoding. It was shown by Tillich and Zemor that in this case the error probability of the block-MAP decoder transitions “quickly” from δ to 1−δ for any δ > 0 if the minimum distance is large. In particular the width of the transition is of order O(1/ √ dmin). We strengthen this result by showing that under suitable conditions on the weight distribution of the code, the transition width can be as small as Θ(1/N 1 2 −κ ), for any κ > 0, even if the minimum distance of the code is not linear. This condition applies e.g., to Reed-Mueller codes. Since Θ(1/N 1 2 ) is the smallest transition possible for any code, we speak of “almost” optimal scaling. We emphasize that the width of the transition says nothing about the location of the transition. Therefore this result has no bearing on whether a code is capacity-achieving or not. As a second contribution, we present a new estimate on the derivative of the EXIT function, the proof of which is based on the Blowing-Up Lemma. 
    more » « less